Presentation Title
The Impact Of Masculinity Threats On Evaluations Of Other Men Based On Femininity And Sexuality Of The Target
Presentation Type
Poster Presentation/Art Exihibt
College
College of Social and Behavioral Sciences
Major
Psychology
Location
Event Center BC
Faculty Mentor
Dr. Joseph D. Wellman
Start Date
5-18-2017 11:00 AM
End Date
5-18-2017 12:00 PM
Abstract
Threats to masculinity have been suggested to promote anti-gay attitudes and discrimination among men. Research has yet to examine if it is gay men’s’ sexuality or perceived femininity that prompts the discriminatory responses. We examine how threats to masculinity impact heterosexual men’s’ evaluation and helping response to a masculine or feminine target who is gay or straight. Heterosexual male participants first completed a “personality test” and either received masculinity-threatening feedback or no feedback. Participants then indicated their evaluation of and helping intentions towards one of four targets: a feminine gay man, feminine straight man, masculine gay man, or masculine straight man. There was a significant 3-way interaction (threat x sexuality x masculinity/femininity) which suggested that, when threatened, heterosexual men evaluated the feminine gay men less favorably and expressed lower helping intentions compared to those in the control condition. Implications for masculinity threat and stereotype congruency theory are discussed.
The Impact Of Masculinity Threats On Evaluations Of Other Men Based On Femininity And Sexuality Of The Target
Event Center BC
Threats to masculinity have been suggested to promote anti-gay attitudes and discrimination among men. Research has yet to examine if it is gay men’s’ sexuality or perceived femininity that prompts the discriminatory responses. We examine how threats to masculinity impact heterosexual men’s’ evaluation and helping response to a masculine or feminine target who is gay or straight. Heterosexual male participants first completed a “personality test” and either received masculinity-threatening feedback or no feedback. Participants then indicated their evaluation of and helping intentions towards one of four targets: a feminine gay man, feminine straight man, masculine gay man, or masculine straight man. There was a significant 3-way interaction (threat x sexuality x masculinity/femininity) which suggested that, when threatened, heterosexual men evaluated the feminine gay men less favorably and expressed lower helping intentions compared to those in the control condition. Implications for masculinity threat and stereotype congruency theory are discussed.