Presentation Title
Measuring Metacognition: A Comparative Validity Study of the Learning Strategies and Self-Awareness Assessment
Presentation Type
Oral Presentation
College
College of Social and Behavioral Sciences
Major
Psychology
Session Number
2
Location
RM 216
Faculty Mentor
Dr. Janet Kottke
Juror Names
Moderator: Dr. Guillermo Escalante
Start Date
5-19-2016 3:20 PM
End Date
5-19-2016 3:40 PM
Abstract
The construct of metacognition has appeared in psychological literature dating back to the early 1970’s. However, the conceptualization of this construct has undergone important changes in the last 45 years as more precise measurement methods have emerged and research has expanded understanding of metacognition. As a result of previous research, metacognition has been considered mainly in terms of cognitive processes. However, one noteworthy aspect of metacognition that has yet to be explored is the behavioral indicators of metacognition. The current study attempted to provide convergent validity to a recently developed metacognition measure that focuses on behaviors rather than cognition. In doing so, three scales, two of which have been psychometrically established, were utilized to measure metacognition in terms of cognitive processes, behavioral indicators, and the relationship between the need for cognition and metacognition. Findings support the idea that metacognition consists of both behavioral and cognitive processes, and metacognition is negatively related to cognition. Implications of these findings, directions for future research, and limitations of the present study are discussed herein.
Measuring Metacognition: A Comparative Validity Study of the Learning Strategies and Self-Awareness Assessment
RM 216
The construct of metacognition has appeared in psychological literature dating back to the early 1970’s. However, the conceptualization of this construct has undergone important changes in the last 45 years as more precise measurement methods have emerged and research has expanded understanding of metacognition. As a result of previous research, metacognition has been considered mainly in terms of cognitive processes. However, one noteworthy aspect of metacognition that has yet to be explored is the behavioral indicators of metacognition. The current study attempted to provide convergent validity to a recently developed metacognition measure that focuses on behaviors rather than cognition. In doing so, three scales, two of which have been psychometrically established, were utilized to measure metacognition in terms of cognitive processes, behavioral indicators, and the relationship between the need for cognition and metacognition. Findings support the idea that metacognition consists of both behavioral and cognitive processes, and metacognition is negatively related to cognition. Implications of these findings, directions for future research, and limitations of the present study are discussed herein.