•  
  •  
 

History in the Making

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Cicero’s attack on Clodia Metelli in Pro Caelio was not a personal animus but a carefully wrought composition of rhetoric that rendered her an ideological emblem of late-Republican instability, reaffirming male authority through the reprobation of a wealthy, autonomous woman. This is supported by demonstrating that Cicero deployed similar characterizations of women across his career; against Sassia in Pro Cluentio and through Chelidon in the In Verrem, establishing it as a structural technique rather than a one-off tactic, and that Roman anxieties about women’s independent wealth provided the cultural conditions that made such rhetoric persuasive. This study engages in close readings of three Ciceronian speeches interpreted through an intersectional feminist perspective. Chong, Kenty and Langlands helped shape the argument. Leen’s analysis of the domus provided the spatial framework which the Chelidon parallel builds on. Steel and Webb’s edited collection established the economic-historical foundation. Xinyue supported the literary parallel to Virgil’s Camilla.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.