Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2021
Publication Title
Journal of Technology Education
Volume
32
Issue
2
First Page
4
Last Page
20
DOI
http://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v32i2.a.1
Keywords
problem-scoping, design, metacognition, cognition, dispositions
Abstract
Highly proficient expert engineers begin the iterative process of design by thoroughly investigating the design problem. Engineering students are often distracted by surface details, leading to a faulty conception of the problem and inappropriate solution strategies. Adequate problem-scoping is arguably the most important step in the design process. To address this issue, the researchers developed an instructional framework to help teachers scaffold students’ cognitive and metacognitive processes during the problem-scoping phase of a design challenge. The purpose of this quasi-experimental study was to investigate the impact that scaffolded instruction related to the SCOPE process had on students’ solution success during a design challenge. The SCOPE process is used to help teachers scaffold students’ design experiences during a tower design challenge and increase the overall effectiveness of their design efforts. Students in this study (N = 802) were separated into treatment and control groups. Using hierarchical multiple regression, the SCOPE process accounted for 40.4% (ΔR2 = .404) of the variability of the design score, which was statistically significant (p < .001). The results indicate that students who received scaffolded instruction from their teachers related to the SCOPE process during the design experience performed better on the design challenge.
Recommended Citation
Hughes, A. J., & Denson, C. D. (2021). Scaffolding Middle and High School Students’ Engineering Design Experiences: Quality Problem-SCOPEing Promoting Successful Solutions. Journal of Technology Education, 32(2), 4–20. DOI: http://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v32i2.a.1
Included in
Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, Educational Leadership Commons, Educational Methods Commons, Educational Psychology Commons, Educational Technology Commons, Engineering Education Commons, Other Engineering Commons, Science and Mathematics Education Commons, Teacher Education and Professional Development Commons