Journal of International Technology and Information Management
Document Type
Article
Abstract
The study assessed factors that influence the acceptance of interoperable electronic Health Records (EHRs) Systems in Tanzania Public Hospitals. The study applied a hybrid model that combined the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE). Snowball sampling technique was applied and a total of 340 questionnaires were distributed to selected clinics, polyclinics and hospitals, of which 261 (77%) received questionnaires were considered to be valid and reliable for subsequent data analysis. IBM SPSS software version 27.0 was employed for data analysis. Findings indicated that relative advantage, compatibility, management support, organizational competency, training and education, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, privacy and security concerns, competitive pressure and regulatory framework have positive and significant effects on acceptance of interoperable EHRs. However, complexity and trading & vendor support were found to have non-significant effects on acceptance of interoperable electronic health records. The study has further provided implications that may assist scholars and policy makers in the implementation of interoperable electronic health systems in the health sector.
Recommended Citation
Mbwambo, Emmanuel and Mandari, Herman
(2023)
"Acceptance of Interoperable Electronic Health Record (EHRs) Systems: A Tanzanian e-Health Perspective,"
Journal of International Technology and Information Management: Vol. 32:
Iss.
1, Article 5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58729/1941-6679.1574
Available at:
https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/jitim/vol32/iss1/5
Included in
Business Intelligence Commons, Communication Technology and New Media Commons, Computer and Systems Architecture Commons, Data Storage Systems Commons, Digital Communications and Networking Commons, E-Commerce Commons, Information Literacy Commons, Management Information Systems Commons, Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods Commons, Operational Research Commons, Science and Technology Studies Commons, Social Media Commons, Technology and Innovation Commons