JOSEA has established the guidelines for its peer-review process.
Once an author submits a manuscript to the editor, it is logged in and checked to make sure that the manuscript is complete and has been prepared according to author submission guidelines and APA guidelines. A receipt of manuscript acknowledgement is sent to the author to let them know that their manuscript has been received by the editor. Each manuscript is then read by an editor to assess its suitability for the journal according to the mission, scope, and author guidelines. This step ensures that the content falls within the scope of the journal, the manuscript follows author and APA guidelines, and that it does not contain an unacceptable level of overlap with manuscripts that are already published. A manuscript could be rejected without additional review for one or more of the previous reasons, and the author will be notified.
If a manuscript is not rejected from the initial screening phase, it is then sent out for review to a minimum of one or two additional reviewer(s) who is experts within the subject matter of the article under review.
The journal employs a double-blind peer-review process where the author of the article is unknown to the reviewers and the reviewers of the article are unknown to the author.
The peer review is completed once the reviewers send their detailed report with comments on the manuscript and their recommendation to the editor. The editor then assesses them collectively, and then makes a decision of the following.
- Accept it as is: the journal will publish the paper in its original form.
- Accept with minor revisions: the journal will publish the paper and asks the author to make small corrections.
- Accept with major revisions (conditional acceptance): the journal will publish the paper provided the authors make the changes suggested by the reviewers and/or editors.
- Revise and resubmit: the journal is willing to reconsider the paper in another round of decision making after the authors make major changes.
- Reject the paper: the journal will not publish the paper or reconsider it even if the authors make major revisions.
An outline of this process is seen in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Review Process
JOSEA employs an open submissions policy and accepts manuscripts anytime. In alignment with the mission statement, the journal welcomes manuscripts developed from quality research outcomes of graduate studies to foster research-based practices for children and youth with special education needs. The journal publishes original research articles and scholarly reviews on broad special education topics. The journal publishes traditional experimental, qualitative, single-subject research, and book reviews.
The manuscript must be original (it has not been published before; that it is not under consideration for publication anywhere else), scientifically accurate, and in good form editorially. The manuscript should be informative, summarizing the basic facts, findings, implications, and maintaining a coherence and unity of thought. The format of headings, tables, figures, citations, references, and other details should follow the latest edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA). Apart from the APA style, it is highly recommended to place tables and figures within the text but not as attachments. No hard copy submission papers will be accepted. Do not use any word processing options/tools, such as-strike through, hidden text, comments, merges, and so forth.
Submit your manuscript to Dr. Sang Nam, firstname.lastname@example.org in either of the following formats.
- RTF -Rich Text Format
As a general rule, manuscripts should not exceed 30 double-spaced pages. Manuscripts containing complex material should be broken up by short, meaningful subheads. Manuscripts should be double-spaced and a font size of 12 is preferred.
Manuscripts should be preceded by an abstract of 100-200 words followed a separate line of keywords. Authors are referred to the latest edition of the Publication Manual of APA for assistance in preparing the abstract.
The review process normally takes 2-4 months to complete depending on the number of review rounds. Accepted manuscripts may be revised for format, organization, and length.
JOSEA adopts APA Ethics Code Standards summarized in the following.
Responsibilities of Authors
Authors must present data that is accurate and complete. Presenting data that has been fabricated or falsified in any way is strictly prohibited (APA Ethics Code Standard: Reporting Research Results).
Modifying and omitting results, and altering visual images to support a hypothesis is prohibited (APA Ethics Code Standard: Avoidance of False or Deceptive Statements).
Authors are responsible for making public and correcting any errors discovered after publication.
Data Retention and Sharing
To ensure an accurate review process, authors do their best in making data available to the editor of JOSEA. After publication, data must be made available to other professionals for scholarly review (APA Ethics Code Standard: Sharing Research Data for Verification).
Piecemeal Publication of Data
Misrepresenting previously published material as original is strictly prohibited (APA Ethics Code Standard: Duplicate Publication of Data). Submitting for publication manuscripts that have been previously published in whole or substantial part elsewhere is strictly prohibited. Therefore, authors must acknowledge and cite previously published work.
Piecemeal, or fragmented, publication is strongly discouraged, so as not to mislead readers to believing that findings were gathered during independent instances of data collection or analyses. Therefore, manuscripts should be presented as completely as possible, unless the author has justifiable reason to report findings in separate manuscripts. Authors who wish to divide the report of a study should inform the editor and provide any information requested by the editor. It is also the responsibility of the author to alert the editor of the existence of any prior or similar publication in another journal.
Plagiarism and Self-Plagiarism
Plagiarism or claiming the written words and ideas of others as one’s own is strictly prohibited. The originating author must be given credit. (APA Ethics Code Standard: Plagiarism). Authors must not present their own previously published work as new scholarship. Doing so is an act of self-plagiarism and is prohibited by JOSEA. When a manuscript is found to have plagiarism, it will be rejected at any point of the peer-review process.
Conflict of Interest
Authors are responsible for reporting any conflicts of interest, existing and potential. In an author’s note or letter, authors must disclose activities and relationships that may be construed as conflicts of interests, including positive and negative biases.
Responsibilities of Editor and Reviewers
The reviewer must recuse himself from the review process of any manuscript should any one of the following be true.
- The reviewer feels unqualified to review an assigned manuscript;
- The reviewer is unable to meet the deadline for completion of the review;
- The reviewer has a conflict of interest such as an obvious personal or professional relationship with the authors or coauthors that can be construed as bias.
The reviewer should immediately notify the editor of any similarities between the manuscript under review and another paper either published or under consideration by JOSEA or another journal. The reviewer should immediately call to the editor’s attention a manuscript containing plagiarized material or falsified data.
The editor and reviewers are prohibited from circulating or quoting manuscripts under editorial review. Unpublished manuscripts are to remain confidential. The only permissible circulation of an unpublished work shall be among editors and reviewers (APA Ethics Code Standard: Reviewers).
Rights and Welfare of Research Participants
Researchers must follow appropriate APA Ethics Code Standards when conducting research with human and animal participants. Authors are required to certify that they have followed these standards.
Authorship shall be limited to those individuals who have made a significant contribution to and willingly accept responsibility for the published work (APA Ethical Code Standard: Publication Credit). Authorship shall not be limited to those who perform the writing, but also to those who have made substantial scientific contributions to a study.